Learn  /  What's new

Meta Muse Wonder explained: Meta's first frontier model, its price and how it compares

After two years of open models and catch-up, Meta now has a closed model in the top tier. What Muse Wonder can do, what it costs compared with Claude, GPT and Gemini, and the catch with the stronger Full version.

What's new7 min readUpdated 21 October 2026
AIAI agentsWhat's new
All guides and cheat sheets

On 12 October 2026, Meta Superintelligence Labs released Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, the first Meta models built to compete with the best from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. They follow the lightweight Muse Spark and the open-weight Muse Spark Open, and they are the first frontier releases since Meta reorganised its AI work under Alexandr Wang in August 2025. Unlike Meta's Llama-era models, these are closed: you use them through Meta's API or its coding app, not by downloading weights.

$4 / $20Input / outputper million tokens, Muse Wonder API
1MContext windowboth models
56Muse Wonder FullArtificial Analysis Intelligence Index
1509Muse Wonder on Arenatext leaderboard, 15 October

Wonder and Wonder Full: what's the difference?

Muse Wonder

API
Model ID
muse-wonder-1.0
Where
Meta Model API and Muse Code
Price
$4 input, $0.20 cached input, $20 output per million tokens
  • Pay per token, works with the OpenAI SDK
  • Meta says performance is comparable to Wonder Full

The one developers and data teams can build on.

Muse Wonder Full

Subscription only
Where
Muse Code, on the Power Usage and Maximum Usage plans
Context
1M tokens
  • Meta's most capable model; top scores in some third-party coding runs (DeepSWE, SWE-Marathon)
  • Not available through the API

For people who code inside Meta's own app.

How it compares

Meta's own model card says both models score comparably to Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra, and that Muse Wonder beats them on MemoryBench, a test of remembering and using information over time. Independent leaderboards put it firmly in the top group, though not on top.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Claude Opus 5.558
Claude Sonnet 5.556
Muse Wonder Full56
Gemini 4 Argon (high)52.6
GPT-6.1 Sol51.8

Higher is better. Independent index, 19 October 2026. Muse Wonder Full is the subscription-only version.

Arena text leaderboard, public votes
Gemini 4 Argon1,524
Muse Wonder1,509
Claude Opus 5.51,508

Higher is better. Scores on 15 October 2026; Gemini 4 Argon's was preliminary. The bars start at 1,450 to show the gaps.

Price: the expensive end of the top tier

Output price per million tokens
$20Muse Wonder
$10Gemini 4 Argon
$10GPT-6.1 Sol
$10Claude Sonnet 5.5
$0.50Claude Haiku 5.5

List prices in USD for standard-length prompts. Gemini 4 Argon's introductory price rises to $20 on 1 December 2026.

At $20 per million output tokens, Muse Wonder costs about twice as much as the models it ties with. TechCrunch put it roughly level with OpenAI's and Anthropic's most expensive tiers. Cached input at $0.20 helps for agents that resend the same long context. Unless its memory features clearly help your use case, the cheaper models in our October comparison give more for the money.

Active memory and long tasks

Active memory
Carries context across conversations and keeps goals, constraints and decisions available, instead of starting fresh each time.
Active focus
Tries other approaches when stuck, asks for clarification and checks in before important actions.
Long agent tasks
Plans multi-step work, calls tools in sequence and recovers from tool errors.
Multimodal
Reads screenshots, charts, documents, images and video. Check audio support before relying on it.
Coding
Multi-file refactors and debugging across large repositories, the focus of Muse Code.

The models were trained on Prometheus, Meta's gigawatt-scale cluster in New Albany, Ohio, which Meta described publicly this week. It connects hundreds of thousands of GPUs, with a target of around a million for future Muse training.

How to try it

Create a key at Meta's developer site, then point any OpenAI-compatible code at the Meta Model API.

Python
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(base_url="<Meta Model API base URL from dev.meta.ai/docs>",
                api_key="YOUR_META_KEY")
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="muse-wonder-1.0",
    messages=[{"role": "user",
               "content": "Explain this SQL query and suggest an index: ..."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)

Check your understanding

1/3How can developers use Muse Wonder Full?

2/3What does Muse Wonder cost per million output tokens?

3/3What is Meta's main selling point for Muse Wonder?

Compare it with the rest of the field in the best AI models in October 2026, and see Meta's open model in Muse Spark Open explained.

Sources: Meta's "Put your ideas to work with Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full" developer post; TechCrunch, "Meta releases its first frontier model, Muse Wonder" (12 October 2026); Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (19 October 2026); Arena text leaderboard (15 October 2026). Vendor benchmarks are Meta's own.

Alessandro Ecclesie AgazziWritten by Alessandro Ecclesie Agazzi, analytics engineer in London. Updated 21 October 2026. About me

Found this useful?

New guides and "what's new" explainers on data and AI land here regularly. Follow along on LinkedIn, or share this one with a colleague.