On 19 October 2026, the start-up Inception released Mercury 3, the newest and largest model in its Mercury family. It is a diffusion language model: instead of writing an answer one token at a time, like ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini, it produces a rough draft of the whole answer and refines every part of it at once. The result is speed. Inception reports 1,068 tokens per second, against roughly 130 for GPT-6 Luna and 240 for Claude Haiku 5.5 in its own comparison, and it now matches those small models on quality in most of the tests it published.
How a diffusion language model works
Every popular chatbot today is autoregressive: it predicts the next token, appends it, and repeats. Each token has to wait for the one before it, so a 1,000-token answer needs 1,000 steps in a row, however powerful the hardware. Diffusion models borrow the idea behind image generators such as Stable Diffusion: start from noise, then remove it over a few passes until a clean result appears.
Autoregressive model
GPT, Claude, Gemini- Writes
- one token at a time, left to right
- Steps for 1,000 tokens
- about 1,000 in sequence
- Mature, well understood, best quality today
- Speed limited by sequential steps
Diffusion model
Mercury 3- Writes
- a full rough draft, then refines it
- Steps for 1,000 tokens
- a handful of parallel passes
- Much faster on the same hardware
- Newer approach, weaker on very long tasks so far
Speed: the headline number
Inception-reported, on Inception-served Nvidia GPUs. Competitor speeds from Inception's own comparison; real speeds vary by provider and load.
In practice, that turns a 500-token answer from a two- to four-second wait into half a second. For a person reading a chat window the difference is nice; for a voice assistant, a smart-glasses display or an agent that chains twenty model calls together, it changes what is possible.
Quality: close to the small frontier models
Inception compared Mercury 3 with the two most popular small models, at medium settings. It leads on 8 of 12 tests. The figures below are Inception's own; no independent leaderboard had published a score at the time of writing.
Higher is better. Inception-reported, medium settings.
Higher is better. Inception-reported.
Higher is better. Inception-reported. One of the tests where Mercury 3 trails.
The pattern is consistent: Mercury 3 is strong at following instructions, science questions (89.2 on GPQA Diamond) and short coding tasks, and weaker at finding details in very long inputs and at longer, multi-step coding (Haiku 5.5 leads on DeepSWE, 51.6 to 46.3). For the full picture of where the small models sit, see the best AI models in October 2026 and Claude Haiku 5.5 explained.
Price and availability
Mercury 3 prices per million tokens
- Input
- $0.20 ($0.10 during the launch offer)
- Output
- $0.70 ($0.35 during the launch offer)
- Cached input
- 90% off
- Free allowance
- 100 million tokens for new accounts
- Claude Haiku 5.5, for comparison
- $0.10 input, $0.50 output (prompts up to 100K)
- GPT-6 Luna, for comparison
- $0.10 input, $0.50 output (short context)
Mercury 3 is available on Inception's API, OpenRouter, Baseten and Vercel AI Gateway. The API follows OpenAI's format, so most code only needs a new base URL and the model name mercury-3. There are no downloadable weights, so you cannot run it on your own servers. Mercury 2 and 2.5 are closed to new users, and existing customers keep access until 15 November 2026.
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.inceptionlabs.ai/v1", api_key="...")
reply = client.chat.completions.create(
model="mercury-3",
reasoning_effort="low", # trade quality for even more speed
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarise this ticket in one line: ..."}],
)
print(reply.choices[0].message.content)Where speed actually matters
- Voice assistants
- A spoken reply that starts in under a second feels natural. Inception also sells Mercury Voice for this.
- Search and smart glasses
- Early user Octen AI reports 0.9 seconds median generation for answers shown on glasses.
- Agent steps
- An agent that makes 20 calls saves minutes per task when each call is four times faster.
- Tutoring and support
- RevisionDojo and Lorikeet use it for instant hints and support replies.
- Classification at scale
- Mercury Decide, a sibling model, handles high-volume labelling.
For analysis that needs deep reasoning over long documents, a larger autoregressive model is still the safer choice. Mercury 3 is best seen as a very fast worker inside a bigger system, not as the brain of it.
Check your understanding
1/3How does a diffusion language model write an answer?
That parallel refinement is why it can pass 1,000 tokens a second.
2/3Where does Mercury 3 trail Claude Haiku 5.5, according to Inception's own tests?
Haiku 5.5 leads on MRCR v2 and DeepSWE.
3/3Can you download Mercury 3 and run it yourself?
It is served by Inception, OpenRouter, Baseten and Vercel.
You got 0 out of 3.
More on this month's models: the best AI models in October 2026, Claude Haiku 5.5 and Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 and Reflection Beam.
Sources: Inception's Mercury 3 announcement (19 October 2026), as reported by MarkTechPost and Unite.AI; OpenRouter's launch listing. All benchmark and speed figures are Inception's own and have not yet been independently reproduced.
